A person with way too many hobbies, but I still continue to learn new things.

  • 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • But is it decentralized? Do the results from multiple spiders get added to give everyone the same quality searches or do I need to scan the whole internet myself?

    [edit] I was looking at this earlier and couldn’t find the info. Started searching again just now and found it immediately… of course… (The answer is YES)


  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyztoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldDecentralized Search Engine
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yep, that’s exactly what I was looking at (https://github.com/searx/searx). As I said, it was a QUICK dive but the wording was enough to make me shy away from it. For all the years I’ve been running servers, I won’t put up anything that requires the latest/greatest of any code because that’s where about 90% of the zero-days seem to come from. Almost all the big ones I’ve seen in the last few years where things that made me panic until I realized that oh, if your updates are more than a year old then none of this affects you. And the one that DID affect me had already been updated through a security release.


  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyztoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldDecentralized Search Engine
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    I just did a quick dive into this and have some concerns. SearX appears to no longer be maintained and was last updated three years ago. SearXNG was forked to use more recent libraries but there were concerns that those are not always stable or fully vetted. There were also concerns that SearXNG did not follow the same concerns for user privacy. It’s a shame that SearX shut down, that one actually sounds like a project I would have jumped on.


  • More drives also equals larger power consumption so you would need a larger battery backup.

    It also means more components prone to failure which increases your chance of losing data. More drives means more moving parts and electrical connections including data and power cables, backplanes, and generated heat that you need to cool down.

    I’d be more concerned over how many failures you’re seeing that makes you think smaller drives would be the better option? I have historically used old drives from ebay or manufacturer refurbs, and even the worst of those have been reliable enough to only have to replace drives once every year or two. With RAID6 or raidz2 you should be plenty secure during a rebuild to prevent data loss. I wouldn’t consider using a lot of little drives unless it’s the only option I had or if someone gave them away for free.